🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to reinitiate nuclear discussions with the United States as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated exclusively dialogue was effective, and shared new appeals had originated from mediators to reopen negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Difficult Course

Araghchi is navigating a challenging route since Iran wishes not to be seen to be operating from a position of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen stronger defensively and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Earlier Negotiations Unexpectedly Ended

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and hostile termination on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with the American leader declaring the sites had been destroyed. Following this, EU nations used their right to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Proposed

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the talks that American atomic experts could work on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Representatives asserted on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Position

Iranian officials declared the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the offer could be resurrected in some form if talks restart.

The American leader last week stated he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to resume discussions, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from America either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of passivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his remarks to the gathering, designed to paint the US as a controlling nation that abuses the concept of international law, Araghchi stated the 12-day war revealed the dispute could not be resolved by armed force. He stated the assaults commenced with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were executed with full US knowledge and collaboration, making trust challenging to restore.

Diplomacy Remains the Primary Resolution

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had consistently tried to dictate their will during the discussions. Dialogue can still be active and continues the ultimate answer to address conflicts, but its criteria, rules and tenets must be followed."

"If they talk to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and respect, they will receive a reply in the same tone."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the battle of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi claimed he was confident Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We learned many lessons from this conflict; we have identified our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He stated: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to eliminate, continues to exist. The installations and gear, if eliminated, will be reconstructed; what is essential is the determination of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but were unable to shatter. The nation of Iran have become more powerful, more integrated, and more backing of the leadership and the country in the aftermath of this attack."